Discover Your WCI Score
Most organizations do not underperform because people lack effort. They underperform because the workforce system sends conflicting signals.
This flagship WCI lens shows where strategy, metrics, rewards, managers, workflows, and day-to-day practice may be working against each other before you invest in another initiative.
Diagnostic
10 signal checks
Five contradiction dimensions measured through a guided assessment.
Output
Score + interpretation
An executive read on where the organization may be creating drag for itself.
Context
Peer-aware
Read against organization size, industry, and the closest cohort we can build.
What you will receive
A score that creates awareness, urgency, and a next move.
- Your WCI Score
- Your organizational risk level
- Three personalized insights
- A recommended next step based on your role, organization size, and current challenge
Optional follow-up
Want the light report emailed too?
Enter your details now and we'll send the on-screen report plus the contradiction cost calculator after the score is ready.
Leave this blank if you want the report to stay on-screen only.
Why context matters
A 75 means something different at 25 people than at 2,500.
Industry, headcount, and role shape how contradiction shows up, how costly it may be, and which next step is actually practical.
Who this is for
Designed for leaders responsible for organizational performance.
- CEOs and founders
- HR and talent leaders
- L&D leaders
- Operations leaders
- Department leaders responsible for execution, adoption, or performance
- Organizations preparing for growth, AI adoption, or operating-model change
How the assessment works
This is built to feel like a diagnosis, not a generic survey.
Recognize the hidden cost
Show how mixed signals create organizational drag that often gets mistaken for a people problem.
Measure contradiction
Score the gap between what leaders say matters and what the system actually reinforces.
Expose the drag
Reveal which contradiction dimension is creating the most friction in daily execution.
Choose the next step
Recommend the most practical next step for the organization based on score, context, and urgency.
What the diagnostic measures
Five contradiction dimensions that shape how work actually gets done.
Dimension
Strategy vs. Execution
Dimension
Promise vs. Training
Dimension
Measurement vs. Reward
Dimension
Teaching vs. Reinforcement
Dimension
Policy vs. Practice
What happens next
The score is the start of the conversation, not the finish line.
You will see the contradiction score, the primary contradiction dimension, three tailored insights, a peer comparison, and the next step that best fits the organization's current level of urgency.
1. Capture the context
Industry, headcount, and role help us interpret the same score differently across organizations.
2. Measure the signal conflict
Ten guided questions translate perceived friction into a contradiction score.
3. Compare against peers
The score is read against the closest cohort we can build from organizations like yours.
4. Recommend the next move
Show one focused next step based on the score, the context, and the level of support the organization is ready to use.
Learn
Understand what your score is telling you.
Best for leaders who want a lower-friction way to interpret the score, build shared language, and start with practical self-service tools.
Start Self-Service
Diagnose
Validate the issue across a team or organization.
Best for organizations that need stronger evidence, cross-stakeholder input, and a clearer view of root causes before choosing an intervention.
Request Diagnostic Proposal
Improve
Change behavior and build alignment over time.
Best for organizations ready to train managers, improve adoption, reinforce new behaviors, and monitor progress.
Build an Alignment Plan